How To Audit Health Insurance Cost Expense
I have engagementen consideration close to national health insurance and I old to be for it. but now I am not sure, as there are two fundamental problems with any national health insurance plan.
The first problem can be summed up briefly. If you have national health care, the government will run it. Quick name anything that the government runs efficiently. Think about how happy you are to renew your drivers license. You trepidation the long lines, the rude clerks, their attitude of ” I dont throw in a damn”. This is the same government that will be running national health insurance. You think you hate your HMO now. You think that CIGNA stands for Cthe entiretyed In Got No Answer, just wait until it is carried over by the government clerks.
And lets be real. You think there is too much administration and paper book pledged in the health care industry now? PLEASE! Again name one government program that has constantly declined paper work and administrative costs.
Remember Ronald Reagans famous line. “The scariest phrase in the world is I am from the government and I am here to help you.”
In theory , national health care insurance sounds great. But the government cannot run anything efficiently, the extrapolated cost of national health insurance hovers wherever around one trillion a year, and you are assuming the government will keep these costs under control. excellent – you are admitted to snicker here. The words government and cost control do not belong in the same sentence. Again, name one government program known for its sterling cost control efforts.
You may hate Blue Cross, but they have shareholders they must report to. They have a profit they must make eawfully year. They have an incentive to keep costs under control. What incentive does the government have to keep costs under control?
The peculiar fundamental problem with national health care is the very judgment that it rests upon. recruits need health care, therefore the government will provide it. Last time I checked, we previously had a private sector providing health insurance.
Now think about that. If the government can take over any private sector business, because ” people need the product.” , that is , at prudent, a very tough argument. And if the government can take over a private sector business, because “they are charging too much”, that again is a very scary proposition.
Look we all need automatedity. But if I dont pay my bill, the power company will close up off my lights. That is not fair. Over 40 million Americans cannot afford power and something must be done about it. The comprehensible answer is to have the goverrment take over my local electric company and provide me with electricity. That will teach the electric company two lessons. First , do not get into business providing a service people “need”. As with national health care, if the government does not like the job you are doing, they will take you over.
The minute lesson. Just like health care premiums, if the electric rates go up too high and the people cannot afford your needed service, the government can step in, take over, and ensure that everyone has affordable premiums, I mean electric rates.
Hmm – government clerks running your health care. And allowing for the government permission to take over any business sector providing a keystone service – electricity, housing, food, gas – just so government clerks can control the costs. Those are two roads I dont want to go down.